Heykuki News
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
Toggle theme
Login
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
241.
▲
"Reading Like It's 1965": Fiction as a window into the past
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
3 years ago
discuss
242.
▲
The most important parts of statistics
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
magoghm
3 years ago
discuss
243.
▲
How to read and then rewrite the title and abstract of a paper
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
3 years ago
discuss
244.
▲
How did some of this goofy psychology research become so popular?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
_delirium
3 years ago
discuss
245.
▲
Crypto scam social science thoughts: The role of elite news media and academia
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
cratermoon
3 years ago
discuss
246.
▲
Why are functional languages so popular in the programming languages community?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
vector_spaces
3 years ago
discuss
247.
▲
Computational linguist Bob Carpenter says LLMs are intelligent. Here’s why
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
MacsHeadroom
3 years ago
discuss
248.
▲
Risk without reward: The myth of wage compensation for hazardous work
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
the88doctor
3 years ago
discuss
249.
▲
What happened with this trial of “How to talk so kids will listen”
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
3 years ago
discuss
250.
▲
Malcolm Gladwell in a Nutshell
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
luu
4 years ago
discuss
251.
▲
Why don’t we talk to each other the way we talk to Google?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
RicoElectrico
4 years ago
discuss
252.
▲
Something can be clear, and it still takes years or even decades to resolve
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
253.
▲
Speculating about assigning probabilities to speculative theories
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
jeffreyrogers
4 years ago
discuss
254.
▲
Statistical methods that only work if you don’t use them
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
255.
▲
From 0 to 100K in 10 years: nurturing open-source community [pdf]
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
256.
▲
Not Frequentist Enough
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
257.
▲
Rich guys and their dumb graphs
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
258.
▲
How feminism has made me a better scientist (2018)
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
259.
▲
WSJ’s reputation publishing a column by s/o associated with fraudulent research?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
260.
▲
A comparative analysis of errors in learning from data in psychology and ML
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
DyslexicAtheist
4 years ago
discuss
261.
▲
“Stylized Facts in the Social Sciences”
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
curiousgal
4 years ago
discuss
262.
▲
Google’s Problems with Reproducibility
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
qsi
4 years ago
discuss
263.
▲
How do things work at top econ journals, exactly?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
amadeuspagel
4 years ago
discuss
264.
▲
Institute for Replication, and the Usual Concerns
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
conformist
4 years ago
discuss
265.
▲
EU proposing to regulate the use of Bayesian estimation
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
jdougan
5 years ago
discuss
266.
▲
Social penumbras predict political attitudes
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
luu
5 years ago
discuss
267.
▲
Discussion of uncertainties in the mask study leads to think about some issues
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
EvgeniyZh
6 years ago
discuss
268.
▲
Concerns with Stanford study of coronavirus(“the authors owe us all an apology”)
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
609venezia
6 years ago
discuss
269.
▲
Junk Science Then and Now
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
luu
6 years ago
discuss
270.
▲
Why does my academic lab keep growing
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
oikos
7 years ago
discuss
More