Heykuki News
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
Toggle theme
Login
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
241.
▲
Ppnas
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
3 years ago
1 comment
242.
▲
Peer Review is as bad as the Peers Reviewing. That’s often awful
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
barry-cotter
6 years ago
1 comment
243.
▲
How Does Stan Work?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
pietroppeter
7 years ago
1 comment
244.
▲
A Statistician Reviews “The Book of Why” by Judea Pearl and Dana Mackenzie
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
joe_the_user
7 years ago
1 comment
245.
▲
Alchemize: PyMC's model to replace Stan/PyMC, etc. with an LLM
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
a month ago
discuss
246.
▲
Handbook of Markov chain Monte Carlo, second edition
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
a month ago
discuss
247.
▲
Remembering David MacKay
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
3 months ago
discuss
248.
▲
Bla bla bla PEER REVIEW bla bla bla
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
eftegarie
7 months ago
discuss
249.
▲
Reasons to Use Bayesian Inference
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
ivansavz
8 months ago
discuss
250.
▲
ChatGPT 5 marginalizing Gelman's measurement error model in Stan
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
momeara
9 months ago
discuss
251.
▲
The crown jewel of the Nudge literature finds its effect cut by 76%
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
nabla9
10 months ago
discuss
252.
▲
Prof requiring students to pay $89.99 self-published course notes
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
apwheele
a year ago
discuss
253.
▲
An alternative Monty Hall problem
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
a year ago
discuss
254.
▲
Is conceptual purity the defining aesthetic in academic computer science?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
luu
a year ago
discuss
255.
▲
How is an American research university funded?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
a year ago
discuss
256.
▲
Committing fraud is,, a viable career strategy
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
a year ago
discuss
257.
▲
The R-squared on this is kinda low, no?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
a year ago
discuss
258.
▲
Why bother engaging outside reviewers at all?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
a year ago
discuss
259.
▲
ChatGPT o1-preview can code Stan
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
lr0
2 years ago
discuss
260.
▲
Sean Carroll/Ellen Langer: Credulous, scientist-as-hero reporting
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
nabla9
2 years ago
discuss
261.
▲
Freakonomics asks, "Why is there so much fraud in academia," missing one reason
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
nabla9
2 years ago
discuss
262.
▲
Google is violating the First Law of Robotics
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
nabla9
2 years ago
discuss
263.
▲
Best way to understand how a method works? Construct scenarios where it fails
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
rossdavidh
2 years ago
discuss
264.
▲
Infovis, Infographics, and Data Visualization
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
265.
▲
What is the prevalence of bad social science?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
266.
▲
The Contrapositive of "Politics and the English Language."
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
luu
2 years ago
discuss
267.
▲
The Contrapositive of "Politics and the English Language."
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
268.
▲
How can a top scientist be so confidently wrong? (2022)
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
EndXA
2 years ago
discuss
269.
▲
Michael Lewis
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
luu
2 years ago
discuss
270.
▲
Is Matthew Walker's "Why We Sleep" Riddled with Scientific/Factual Errors?(2019)
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
More