Heykuki News

TopNewBestAskShowJobs
TopNewBestAskShowJobs
241.
Ppnas (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
3 years ago
1 comment
242.
Peer Review is as bad as the Peers Reviewing. That’s often awful (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
barry-cotter
6 years ago
1 comment
243.
How Does Stan Work? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
pietroppeter
7 years ago
1 comment
244.
A Statistician Reviews “The Book of Why” by Judea Pearl and Dana Mackenzie (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
joe_the_user
7 years ago
1 comment
245.
Alchemize: PyMC's model to replace Stan/PyMC, etc. with an LLM (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
a month ago
discuss
246.
Handbook of Markov chain Monte Carlo, second edition (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
a month ago
discuss
247.
Remembering David MacKay (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
3 months ago
discuss
248.
Bla bla bla PEER REVIEW bla bla bla (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
eftegarie
7 months ago
discuss
249.
Reasons to Use Bayesian Inference (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
ivansavz
8 months ago
discuss
250.
ChatGPT 5 marginalizing Gelman's measurement error model in Stan (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
momeara
9 months ago
discuss
251.
The crown jewel of the Nudge literature finds its effect cut by 76% (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
nabla9
10 months ago
discuss
252.
Prof requiring students to pay $89.99 self-published course notes (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
apwheele
a year ago
discuss
253.
An alternative Monty Hall problem (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
a year ago
discuss
254.
Is conceptual purity the defining aesthetic in academic computer science? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
luu
a year ago
discuss
255.
How is an American research university funded? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
a year ago
discuss
256.
Committing fraud is,, a viable career strategy (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
a year ago
discuss
257.
The R-squared on this is kinda low, no? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
a year ago
discuss
258.
Why bother engaging outside reviewers at all? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
a year ago
discuss
259.
ChatGPT o1-preview can code Stan (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
lr0
2 years ago
discuss
260.
Sean Carroll/Ellen Langer: Credulous, scientist-as-hero reporting (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
nabla9
2 years ago
discuss
261.
Freakonomics asks, "Why is there so much fraud in academia," missing one reason (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
nabla9
2 years ago
discuss
262.
Google is violating the First Law of Robotics (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
nabla9
2 years ago
discuss
263.
Best way to understand how a method works? Construct scenarios where it fails (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
rossdavidh
2 years ago
discuss
264.
Infovis, Infographics, and Data Visualization (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
265.
What is the prevalence of bad social science? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
266.
The Contrapositive of "Politics and the English Language." (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
luu
2 years ago
discuss
267.
The Contrapositive of "Politics and the English Language." (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
268.
How can a top scientist be so confidently wrong? (2022) (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
EndXA
2 years ago
discuss
269.
Michael Lewis (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
luu
2 years ago
discuss
270.
Is Matthew Walker's "Why We Sleep" Riddled with Scientific/Factual Errors?(2019) (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
More