Heykuki News

TopNewBestAskShowJobs
TopNewBestAskShowJobs
211.
Remembering David MacKay (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
3 months ago
discuss
212.
Bla bla bla PEER REVIEW bla bla bla (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
eftegarie
7 months ago
discuss
213.
Reasons to Use Bayesian Inference (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
ivansavz
8 months ago
discuss
214.
ChatGPT 5 marginalizing Gelman's measurement error model in Stan (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
momeara
9 months ago
discuss
215.
The crown jewel of the Nudge literature finds its effect cut by 76% (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
nabla9
10 months ago
discuss
216.
Prof requiring students to pay $89.99 self-published course notes (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
apwheele
a year ago
discuss
217.
An alternative Monty Hall problem (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
a year ago
discuss
218.
Is conceptual purity the defining aesthetic in academic computer science? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
luu
a year ago
discuss
219.
How is an American research university funded? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
a year ago
discuss
220.
Committing fraud is,, a viable career strategy (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
a year ago
discuss
221.
The R-squared on this is kinda low, no? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
a year ago
discuss
222.
Why bother engaging outside reviewers at all? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
a year ago
discuss
223.
ChatGPT o1-preview can code Stan (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
lr0
2 years ago
discuss
224.
Sean Carroll/Ellen Langer: Credulous, scientist-as-hero reporting (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
nabla9
2 years ago
discuss
225.
Freakonomics asks, "Why is there so much fraud in academia," missing one reason (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
nabla9
2 years ago
discuss
226.
Google is violating the First Law of Robotics (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
nabla9
2 years ago
discuss
227.
Best way to understand how a method works? Construct scenarios where it fails (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
rossdavidh
2 years ago
discuss
228.
Infovis, Infographics, and Data Visualization (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
229.
What is the prevalence of bad social science? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
230.
The Contrapositive of "Politics and the English Language." (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
luu
2 years ago
discuss
231.
The Contrapositive of "Politics and the English Language." (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
232.
How can a top scientist be so confidently wrong? (2022) (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
EndXA
2 years ago
discuss
233.
Michael Lewis (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
luu
2 years ago
discuss
234.
Is Matthew Walker's "Why We Sleep" Riddled with Scientific/Factual Errors?(2019) (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
235.
Clinical trials that are designed to fail (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
236.
Number of inline code comments is zero. Nada. Zilch. Nil. Naught (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
thaumasiotes
2 years ago
discuss
237.
The Onion (ok, an Onion-affiliate site) is plagiarizing. For reals (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
238.
Explaining that line, "Bayesians moving from defense to offense" (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
hackandthink
2 years ago
discuss
239.
Explainable AI works, but only when we don't need it (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
harperlee
2 years ago
discuss
240.
AI Bus Route Fail (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
RicoElectrico
2 years ago
discuss
More