Heykuki News
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
Toggle theme
Login
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
181.
▲
A Suggestion for Freakonomics and Sean Carroll
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
gjf
9 months ago
discuss
182.
▲
About that bogus claim that "chess grandmasters" burn 6000 calories per day
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
Tomte
a year ago
discuss
183.
▲
Skepticism about the science establishment, then and now
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
luu
a year ago
discuss
184.
▲
"Does anyone expect meaningful insight to come from a study like this?"
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
nabla9
a year ago
discuss
185.
▲
A 10% swing in win probability corresponds to a 0.4% swing in predicted vote
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
186.
▲
Which books, papers, and blogs are in the Bayesian canon?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
banjo_milkman
2 years ago
discuss
187.
▲
Why isn't Barack Obama out there giving political speeches?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
188.
▲
Bayesian Data Analysis 3rd Ed [pdf]
(stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
Anon84
3 years ago
discuss
189.
▲
Plotting y(t) vs. y'(t), tracing over time with a dot for each year
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
leonry
4 years ago
discuss
190.
▲
CDC as bad as Harvard? – – – no, but they could still do better
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
temp8964
5 years ago
discuss
191.
▲
Did that “bottomless soup bowl” experiment ever happen?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
cribbles
5 years ago
discuss
192.
▲
Credentialism, elite employment, and career aspirations
(stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
cwan
15 years ago
discuss
193.
▲
Bayes: Radical, Liberal, or Conservative?
(stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
dschoon
15 years ago
discuss
194.
▲
The fractal nature of scientific revolutions (2005)
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
Tomte
a year ago
1 comment
195.
▲
Why are there squares everywhere in statistics?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
Tomte
23 days ago
discuss
196.
▲
How to report a N=12 study?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
caminanteblanco
2 months ago
discuss
197.
▲
The Paradox of Derivatives and Integrals
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
saeedesmaili
2 months ago
discuss
198.
▲
Who has the lowest Erdos-Bacon-Epstein number?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
varjag
4 months ago
discuss
199.
▲
ML research is not serious research, NeurIPS board statement suggests
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
u1hcw9nx
4 months ago
discuss
200.
▲
"Belief in the law of small numbers" the continuing appeal of junk science
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
nabla9
7 months ago
discuss
201.
▲
It's a Jax, Jax, Jax, Jax World
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
thebeardisred
8 months ago
discuss
202.
▲
"Causal" is like "error term"
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
neehao
9 months ago
discuss
203.
▲
Ecologists' endless quest for automatic inference
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
williamjsdavis
a year ago
discuss
204.
▲
What Happened to Genetic Algorithms?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
Areibman
a year ago
discuss
205.
▲
An election forecast that's 50-50 is not "giving up."
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
Tomte
a year ago
discuss
206.
▲
Softmax is on the log, not the logit scale
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
Tomte
a year ago
discuss
207.
▲
Physics is like Brazil, Statistics is like Chile
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
208.
▲
Levels of fraud: One-time, Linear, and Exponential
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
209.
▲
You can guarantee that the term "statistical guarantee" will irritate me
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
210.
▲
Is it really "the economy, stupid"?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
munichpavel
2 years ago
discuss
More