Heykuki News

TopNewBestAskShowJobs
TopNewBestAskShowJobs
181.
A Suggestion for Freakonomics and Sean Carroll (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
gjf
9 months ago
discuss
182.
About that bogus claim that "chess grandmasters" burn 6000 calories per day (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
Tomte
a year ago
discuss
183.
Skepticism about the science establishment, then and now (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
luu
a year ago
discuss
184.
"Does anyone expect meaningful insight to come from a study like this?" (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
nabla9
a year ago
discuss
185.
A 10% swing in win probability corresponds to a 0.4% swing in predicted vote (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
186.
Which books, papers, and blogs are in the Bayesian canon? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
banjo_milkman
2 years ago
discuss
187.
Why isn't Barack Obama out there giving political speeches? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
188.
Bayesian Data Analysis 3rd Ed [pdf] (stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
Anon84
3 years ago
discuss
189.
Plotting y(t) vs. y'(t), tracing over time with a dot for each year (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
leonry
4 years ago
discuss
190.
CDC as bad as Harvard? – – – no, but they could still do better (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
temp8964
5 years ago
discuss
191.
Did that “bottomless soup bowl” experiment ever happen? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
cribbles
5 years ago
discuss
192.
Credentialism, elite employment, and career aspirations (stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
cwan
15 years ago
discuss
193.
Bayes: Radical, Liberal, or Conservative? (stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
dschoon
15 years ago
discuss
194.
The fractal nature of scientific revolutions (2005) (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
Tomte
a year ago
1 comment
195.
Why are there squares everywhere in statistics? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
Tomte
23 days ago
discuss
196.
How to report a N=12 study? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
caminanteblanco
2 months ago
discuss
197.
The Paradox of Derivatives and Integrals (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
saeedesmaili
2 months ago
discuss
198.
Who has the lowest Erdos-Bacon-Epstein number? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
varjag
4 months ago
discuss
199.
ML research is not serious research, NeurIPS board statement suggests (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
u1hcw9nx
4 months ago
discuss
200.
"Belief in the law of small numbers" the continuing appeal of junk science (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
nabla9
7 months ago
discuss
201.
It's a Jax, Jax, Jax, Jax World (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
thebeardisred
8 months ago
discuss
202.
"Causal" is like "error term" (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
neehao
9 months ago
discuss
203.
Ecologists' endless quest for automatic inference (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
williamjsdavis
a year ago
discuss
204.
What Happened to Genetic Algorithms? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
Areibman
a year ago
discuss
205.
An election forecast that's 50-50 is not "giving up." (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
Tomte
a year ago
discuss
206.
Softmax is on the log, not the logit scale (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
Tomte
a year ago
discuss
207.
Physics is like Brazil, Statistics is like Chile (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
208.
Levels of fraud: One-time, Linear, and Exponential (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
209.
You can guarantee that the term "statistical guarantee" will irritate me (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
210.
Is it really "the economy, stupid"? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
munichpavel
2 years ago
discuss
More