Heykuki News
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
Toggle theme
Login
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
151.
▲
About that bogus claim that "chess grandmasters" burn 6000 calories per day
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
Tomte
a year ago
discuss
152.
▲
Skepticism about the science establishment, then and now
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
luu
a year ago
discuss
153.
▲
"Does anyone expect meaningful insight to come from a study like this?"
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
nabla9
a year ago
discuss
154.
▲
A 10% swing in win probability corresponds to a 0.4% swing in predicted vote
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
155.
▲
Which books, papers, and blogs are in the Bayesian canon?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
banjo_milkman
2 years ago
discuss
156.
▲
Why isn't Barack Obama out there giving political speeches?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
157.
▲
Plotting y(t) vs. y'(t), tracing over time with a dot for each year
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
leonry
4 years ago
discuss
158.
▲
CDC as bad as Harvard? – – – no, but they could still do better
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
temp8964
5 years ago
discuss
159.
▲
Did that “bottomless soup bowl” experiment ever happen?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
5 points
cribbles
5 years ago
discuss
160.
▲
The fractal nature of scientific revolutions (2005)
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
Tomte
a year ago
1 comment
161.
▲
Why are there squares everywhere in statistics?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
Tomte
23 days ago
discuss
162.
▲
How to report a N=12 study?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
caminanteblanco
2 months ago
discuss
163.
▲
The Paradox of Derivatives and Integrals
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
saeedesmaili
2 months ago
discuss
164.
▲
Who has the lowest Erdos-Bacon-Epstein number?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
varjag
4 months ago
discuss
165.
▲
ML research is not serious research, NeurIPS board statement suggests
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
u1hcw9nx
4 months ago
discuss
166.
▲
"Belief in the law of small numbers" the continuing appeal of junk science
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
nabla9
7 months ago
discuss
167.
▲
It's a Jax, Jax, Jax, Jax World
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
thebeardisred
8 months ago
discuss
168.
▲
"Causal" is like "error term"
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
neehao
9 months ago
discuss
169.
▲
Ecologists' endless quest for automatic inference
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
williamjsdavis
a year ago
discuss
170.
▲
What Happened to Genetic Algorithms?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
Areibman
a year ago
discuss
171.
▲
An election forecast that's 50-50 is not "giving up."
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
Tomte
a year ago
discuss
172.
▲
Softmax is on the log, not the logit scale
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
Tomte
a year ago
discuss
173.
▲
Physics is like Brazil, Statistics is like Chile
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
174.
▲
Levels of fraud: One-time, Linear, and Exponential
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
175.
▲
You can guarantee that the term "statistical guarantee" will irritate me
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
176.
▲
Is it really "the economy, stupid"?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
munichpavel
2 years ago
discuss
177.
▲
What are the best scientific papers ever written?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
reqo
2 years ago
discuss
178.
▲
Zotero now features retraction notices
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
179.
▲
The causal revolution in econometrics has gone too far
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
luu
3 years ago
discuss
180.
▲
Corruption Statistics Are Incredible
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
4 points
nabla9
3 years ago
discuss
More