Heykuki News

TopNewBestAskShowJobs
TopNewBestAskShowJobs
541.
Mister P for the 2020 presidential election in Belarus [pdf] (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
1 point
luu
6 years ago
discuss
542.
How to describe Pfizer’s beta(0.7, 1) prior on vaccine effect? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
1 point
luu
6 years ago
discuss
543.
Did blind orchestra auditions actually benefit women? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
1 point
elsewhen
6 years ago
discuss
544.
Why it's so relaxing to think about social issues (stat.columbia.edu)
1 point
clay
15 years ago
discuss
545.
One more time-use graph (stat.columbia.edu)
1 point
clay
15 years ago
discuss
546.
IRB Nightmares (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
1 point
apsec112
6 years ago
discuss
547.
Understanding the “average treatment effect” number (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
1 point
elsewhen
6 years ago
discuss
548.
“The Intellectuals and the Masses” (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
1 point
luu
6 years ago
discuss
549.
MIT’s science magazine misrepresents critics of Stanford study (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
1 point
hhs
6 years ago
discuss
550.
Alexey Guzey’s sleep deprivation self-experiment (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
1 point
luu
6 years ago
discuss
551.
Uncertainty and Variation as Distinct Concepts (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
1 point
luu
6 years ago
discuss
552.
Positive Claims Get Publicity, Refutations Do Not: Evidence from the 2020 Flu (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
1 point
luu
6 years ago
discuss
553.
Concerns with that Stanford study of coronavirus prevalence (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
1 point
lalaland1125
6 years ago
discuss
554.
Junk Science Then and Now (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
1 point
ninninhall
6 years ago
discuss
555.
Junk Science Then and Now (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
1 point
telotortium
6 years ago
discuss
556.
Vaping statistics controversy update: A retraction and some dispute (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
1 point
luu
6 years ago
discuss
557.
Advice for a Young Economist at Heart (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
1 point
luu
6 years ago
discuss
558.
Back to basics: How is statistics relevant to scientific discovery? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
1 point
_eigenfoo
6 years ago
discuss
559.
What Happened to the Hiccups? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
1 point
golergka
6 years ago
discuss
560.
What Happened to the Hiccups? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
1 point
johndcook
6 years ago
discuss
561.
Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics [pdf] (stat.columbia.edu)
1 point
bookofjoe
7 years ago
discuss
562.
Why didn’t they say they were sorry when it turned out they’d messed up? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
1 point
olooney
7 years ago
discuss
563.
(usually) log transform your positive data (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
1 point
drkimball
7 years ago
discuss
564.
Shit Sandwich (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
1 point
dxbydt
7 years ago
discuss
565.
Tony Nominations Mean Nothing (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
1 point
luu
7 years ago
discuss
566.
What are some common but easily avoidable graphical mistakes? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
1 point
drkimball
7 years ago
discuss
567.
Gaps in the popular presentations of scientific theories (stat.columbia.edu)
1 point
breily
18 years ago
discuss
568.
Human capital investments are no more effective when targeted at younger ages (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
1 point
barry-cotter
7 years ago
discuss
569.
What is the most important real-world data processing tip? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
1 point
megacorp
7 years ago
discuss
570.
Some solutions to the p-value communication problem– and why they won’t work [pdf] (stat.columbia.edu)
1 point
nonbel
9 years ago
discuss
More