Heykuki News

TopNewBestAskShowJobs
TopNewBestAskShowJobs
421.
I was looking through the wrong end of the telescope (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
422.
“Would Democratic Socialism Be Better?” (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
423.
The problem with (some) science: How much is it a problem with process? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
424.
How do things work at top econ journals, exactly? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
luu
4 years ago
discuss
425.
A Bayesian framework for interpreting findings from impact evaluations (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
426.
How to Get Confident with Statistics (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
RafelMri
4 years ago
discuss
427.
People whose job it is to do just one thing aren’t always good at that one thing (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
syntaxfree
4 years ago
discuss
428.
SBC: A new R package for simulation-based calibration of Bayesian models (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
luu
4 years ago
discuss
429.
Colors in R [pdf] (stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
trompe-le-monde
4 years ago
discuss
430.
Forking Paths and Gerrymandering (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
hn-0001
4 years ago
discuss
431.
How things work at top econ journals: Gelman (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
srvmshr
4 years ago
discuss
432.
Problems with a meta-analysis of “nudging” in PNAS (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
HuShifang
4 years ago
discuss
433.
Objectively Worse but Practically Better (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
dxbydt
4 years ago
discuss
434.
Controversy re: “Facial recognition technology can expose political orientation“ (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
danso
5 years ago
discuss
435.
Thoughts on “ASA on Statistical Significance and Replicability” (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
nabla9
5 years ago
discuss
436.
Infovis and Statistical Graphics: Different Goals, Different Look [pdf] (stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
agconway
15 years ago
discuss
437.
Doubting the IHME claims about excess deaths by country (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
nabla9
5 years ago
discuss
438.
Statistical fallacies as they arise in political science [pdf] (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
ReDeiPirati
5 years ago
discuss
439.
Shades of Gray: A Research Story [2013] (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
shrikant
5 years ago
discuss
440.
The “statistical” portion of the Texas election lawsuit (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
the_decider
5 years ago
discuss
441.
The Most Important Statistical Ideas of the Past 50 Years (Gelman&Vehtari, 2020) [pdf] (stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
angry-tempest
6 years ago
discuss
442.
Holes in Bayesian Statistics [pdf] (stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
nabla9
6 years ago
discuss
443.
Calibration problem in tails of our election forecast (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
luu
6 years ago
discuss
444.
The “Scientist as Hero” Narrative (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
tomrod
6 years ago
discuss
445.
What are the best scientific papers ever written? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
nabla9
6 years ago
discuss
446.
How much of rising Trump approval can be attributed to differential nonresponse? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
smacktoward
6 years ago
discuss
447.
My review of Ian Stewart’s review of my review of his book (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
luu
6 years ago
discuss
448.
“Why we sleep” data manipulation: A smoking gun? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
barry-cotter
6 years ago
discuss
449.
What Happened to the Hiccups? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
monort
6 years ago
discuss
450.
What does it mean when they say there’s a 30% chance of rain? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
AW91
6 years ago
discuss
More