Heykuki News
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
Toggle theme
Login
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
421.
▲
I was looking through the wrong end of the telescope
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
422.
▲
“Would Democratic Socialism Be Better?”
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
423.
▲
The problem with (some) science: How much is it a problem with process?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
424.
▲
How do things work at top econ journals, exactly?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
luu
4 years ago
discuss
425.
▲
A Bayesian framework for interpreting findings from impact evaluations
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
426.
▲
How to Get Confident with Statistics
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
RafelMri
4 years ago
discuss
427.
▲
People whose job it is to do just one thing aren’t always good at that one thing
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
syntaxfree
4 years ago
discuss
428.
▲
SBC: A new R package for simulation-based calibration of Bayesian models
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
luu
4 years ago
discuss
429.
▲
Colors in R [pdf]
(stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
trompe-le-monde
4 years ago
discuss
430.
▲
Forking Paths and Gerrymandering
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
hn-0001
4 years ago
discuss
431.
▲
How things work at top econ journals: Gelman
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
srvmshr
4 years ago
discuss
432.
▲
Problems with a meta-analysis of “nudging” in PNAS
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
HuShifang
4 years ago
discuss
433.
▲
Objectively Worse but Practically Better
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
dxbydt
4 years ago
discuss
434.
▲
Controversy re: “Facial recognition technology can expose political orientation“
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
danso
5 years ago
discuss
435.
▲
Thoughts on “ASA on Statistical Significance and Replicability”
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
nabla9
5 years ago
discuss
436.
▲
Infovis and Statistical Graphics: Different Goals, Different Look [pdf]
(stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
agconway
15 years ago
discuss
437.
▲
Doubting the IHME claims about excess deaths by country
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
nabla9
5 years ago
discuss
438.
▲
Statistical fallacies as they arise in political science [pdf]
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
ReDeiPirati
5 years ago
discuss
439.
▲
Shades of Gray: A Research Story [2013]
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
shrikant
5 years ago
discuss
440.
▲
The “statistical” portion of the Texas election lawsuit
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
the_decider
5 years ago
discuss
441.
▲
The Most Important Statistical Ideas of the Past 50 Years (Gelman&Vehtari, 2020) [pdf]
(stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
angry-tempest
6 years ago
discuss
442.
▲
Holes in Bayesian Statistics [pdf]
(stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
nabla9
6 years ago
discuss
443.
▲
Calibration problem in tails of our election forecast
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
luu
6 years ago
discuss
444.
▲
The “Scientist as Hero” Narrative
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
tomrod
6 years ago
discuss
445.
▲
What are the best scientific papers ever written?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
nabla9
6 years ago
discuss
446.
▲
How much of rising Trump approval can be attributed to differential nonresponse?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
smacktoward
6 years ago
discuss
447.
▲
My review of Ian Stewart’s review of my review of his book
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
luu
6 years ago
discuss
448.
▲
“Why we sleep” data manipulation: A smoking gun?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
barry-cotter
6 years ago
discuss
449.
▲
What Happened to the Hiccups?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
monort
6 years ago
discuss
450.
▲
What does it mean when they say there’s a 30% chance of rain?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
AW91
6 years ago
discuss
More