Heykuki News

TopNewBestAskShowJobs
TopNewBestAskShowJobs
361.
From 0 to 100K in 10 years: nurturing open-source community [pdf] (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
luu
4 years ago
discuss
362.
(Now that faculty aren’t coming into the office) Will universities recover? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
jeffreyrogers
4 years ago
discuss
363.
Bayesian inference for discrete parameters and for continuous parameters (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
luu
4 years ago
discuss
364.
This Time, don’t blame the news media (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
365.
Junk science and unavailable data at the European Heart Journal (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
366.
Which User? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
367.
I don’t think this study on discriminatory attitudes is useful (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
368.
Is there any heuristic we might use to identify wholly inappropriate stats (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
369.
Krueger Uber $100k Update (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
blopeur
4 years ago
discuss
370.
“Unsupervised learning” gets a bad rap (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
RafelMri
4 years ago
discuss
371.
Historical journal records reveal a surge of methodological distortions (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
nojito
4 years ago
discuss
372.
I was looking through the wrong end of the telescope (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
373.
“Would Democratic Socialism Be Better?” (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
374.
The problem with (some) science: How much is it a problem with process? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
375.
How do things work at top econ journals, exactly? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
luu
4 years ago
discuss
376.
A Bayesian framework for interpreting findings from impact evaluations (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
377.
How to Get Confident with Statistics (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
RafelMri
4 years ago
discuss
378.
People whose job it is to do just one thing aren’t always good at that one thing (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
syntaxfree
4 years ago
discuss
379.
SBC: A new R package for simulation-based calibration of Bayesian models (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
luu
4 years ago
discuss
380.
Forking Paths and Gerrymandering (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
hn-0001
4 years ago
discuss
381.
How things work at top econ journals: Gelman (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
srvmshr
4 years ago
discuss
382.
Problems with a meta-analysis of “nudging” in PNAS (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
HuShifang
4 years ago
discuss
383.
Objectively Worse but Practically Better (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
dxbydt
4 years ago
discuss
384.
Controversy re: “Facial recognition technology can expose political orientation“ (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
danso
5 years ago
discuss
385.
Thoughts on “ASA on Statistical Significance and Replicability” (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
nabla9
5 years ago
discuss
386.
Doubting the IHME claims about excess deaths by country (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
nabla9
5 years ago
discuss
387.
Statistical fallacies as they arise in political science [pdf] (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
ReDeiPirati
5 years ago
discuss
388.
Shades of Gray: A Research Story [2013] (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
shrikant
5 years ago
discuss
389.
The “statistical” portion of the Texas election lawsuit (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
the_decider
5 years ago
discuss
390.
Calibration problem in tails of our election forecast (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
luu
6 years ago
discuss
More