Heykuki News
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
Toggle theme
Login
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
331.
▲
Predicting MLB Performance and Differences Between Baseball and Politics
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
luu
2 years ago
discuss
332.
▲
Our new book, Active Statistics, is now available
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
333.
▲
Michael Lewis.
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
_pfco
2 years ago
discuss
334.
▲
When all else fails, add a code comment
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
ivan_ah
2 years ago
discuss
335.
▲
"Don't feed the trolls" and the troll semi-bluff
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
luu
2 years ago
discuss
336.
▲
The importance of "bumblers" and "pointers" in science (2023)
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
EndXA
2 years ago
discuss
337.
▲
John Mandrola's tips for assessing medical evidence
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
tacon
2 years ago
discuss
338.
▲
Explaining that line, "Bayesians moving from defense to offense"
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
magoghm
2 years ago
discuss
339.
▲
More than 10k scientific papers were retracted in 2023
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
340.
▲
Concerns about misconduct at Harvard's department of government and elsewhere
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
341.
▲
Should statistics have a Nobel Prize? (2013)
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
EndXA
3 years ago
discuss
342.
▲
On a bad paper on birth month and autism
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
luu
3 years ago
discuss
343.
▲
Many ways to trick a deep model
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
3 years ago
discuss
344.
▲
If they accept blood money, they should accept that money anonymously
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
3 years ago
discuss
345.
▲
Universities are going to accept blood money
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
hackandthink
3 years ago
discuss
346.
▲
Why I’m skeptical of “steelmanning” (2022)
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
3 years ago
discuss
347.
▲
A Bayesian framework for interpreting findings from impact evaluations. (2022)
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
3 years ago
discuss
348.
▲
The migration of tech hype from the fringes to the media and academic mainstream
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
hackandthink
3 years ago
discuss
349.
▲
“Bayes is guaranteed to overfit”: What does this mean? There’s a factor of 2
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
luu
3 years ago
discuss
350.
▲
Bob Carpenter says LLMs are intelligent
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
chalst
3 years ago
discuss
351.
▲
Reflections on Empirical Bayes
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
luu
3 years ago
discuss
352.
▲
ChatGPT can write talks about brms and run a D&D game
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
magoghm
3 years ago
discuss
353.
▲
Columbia Journalism Review garbles public opinion stats
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
luu
3 years ago
discuss
354.
▲
Students learn more from active classrooms, but they think they’re learning less
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
chazeon
3 years ago
discuss
355.
▲
How to model a non-monotonic relation?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
saeranv
3 years ago
discuss
356.
▲
Statistical Experiments and Science Experiments
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
3 years ago
discuss
357.
▲
Bayes: Radical, Liberal, or Conservative? (2007)
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
358.
▲
The Discount Cost Paradox?
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
luu
4 years ago
discuss
359.
▲
How can something be clear and unambiguous and still take decades to resolve
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
k0stas
4 years ago
discuss
360.
▲
Hey It’s Time for Another Greatest Seminar Speaker
(statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
More