Heykuki News

TopNewBestAskShowJobs
TopNewBestAskShowJobs
301.
Institute for Replication, and the Usual Concerns (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
conformist
4 years ago
discuss
302.
EU proposing to regulate the use of Bayesian estimation (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
jdougan
5 years ago
discuss
303.
Why Your Klout Score Is Meaningless (stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
clay
15 years ago
discuss
304.
When Did Girls Start Wearing Pink? (stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
clay
15 years ago
discuss
305.
Social penumbras predict political attitudes (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
luu
5 years ago
discuss
306.
Discussion of uncertainties in the mask study leads to think about some issues (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
EvgeniyZh
6 years ago
discuss
307.
Concerns with Stanford study of coronavirus(“the authors owe us all an apology”) (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
609venezia
6 years ago
discuss
308.
Junk Science Then and Now (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
luu
6 years ago
discuss
309.
Philosophy and the Practice of Bayesian Statistics (2013) [pdf] (stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
headalgorithm
7 years ago
discuss
310.
Why does my academic lab keep growing (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
oikos
7 years ago
discuss
311.
Stanc3: Rewriting the Stan Compiler (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
clircle
7 years ago
discuss
312.
Andrew Gelman on Hipmunk (stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
abeppu
16 years ago
discuss
313.
You Can Load a Die, but You Can't Bias a Coin [pdf] (stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
romain_g
9 years ago
discuss
314.
A Layered Grammar of Graphics (2010) [pdf] (stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
tokai
10 years ago
discuss
315.
Statisticians: When We Teach, We Don’t Practice What We Preach [pdf] (stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
tokenadult
10 years ago
discuss
316.
A little problem to test your probability intuitions (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
4 years ago
5 comments
317.
Could referendums defuse political polarization? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
4 years ago
3 comments
318.
Why isn't it possible to play a fun and serious game of poker not for money? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
a month ago
1 comment
319.
Did Taylor Swift kill a bunch of people? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
u1hcw9nx
2 months ago
1 comment
320.
My (uninformed) theory about Jeff Bezos and the Washington Post (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
2 months ago
1 comment
321.
It's a Jax, Jax, Jax, Jax World (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
bacr
8 months ago
1 comment
322.
Two different opinion-field inversions that differ in some important ways (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
a year ago
1 comment
323.
The rise and fall of Seth Roberts and the Shangri-La diet (2023) (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
sowbug
2 years ago
1 comment
324.
Prediction markets need dumb money as well as smart money (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
johndcook
2 years ago
1 comment
325.
Whassup with those economists who predicted a recession that then didn't happen? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
_pfco
2 years ago
1 comment
326.
Stupid legal arguments: a moral hazard? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
3 years ago
1 comment
327.
How can a top scientist be so confidently wrong? (R.A. Fisher smoking example) (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
LittlePeter
4 years ago
1 comment
328.
Buying things vs. buying experiences (vs. buying nothing at all) (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
Tomte
4 years ago
1 comment
329.
Nudgelords: Given their past track record, why should I trust them this time? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
leonry
4 years ago
1 comment
330.
The view that the scientific process is “red tape” (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
2 points
todsacerdoti
6 years ago
1 comment
More