Heykuki News

TopNewBestAskShowJobs
TopNewBestAskShowJobs
271.
Clinical trials that are designed to fail (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
272.
Number of inline code comments is zero. Nada. Zilch. Nil. Naught (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
thaumasiotes
2 years ago
discuss
273.
The Onion (ok, an Onion-affiliate site) is plagiarizing. For reals (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
2 years ago
discuss
274.
Explaining that line, "Bayesians moving from defense to offense" (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
hackandthink
2 years ago
discuss
275.
Explainable AI works, but only when we don't need it (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
harperlee
2 years ago
discuss
276.
AI Bus Route Fail (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
RicoElectrico
2 years ago
discuss
277.
"Reading Like It's 1965": Fiction as a window into the past (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
3 years ago
discuss
278.
The most important parts of statistics (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
magoghm
3 years ago
discuss
279.
How to read and then rewrite the title and abstract of a paper (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
3 years ago
discuss
280.
How did some of this goofy psychology research become so popular? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
_delirium
3 years ago
discuss
281.
Crypto scam social science thoughts: The role of elite news media and academia (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
cratermoon
3 years ago
discuss
282.
Why are functional languages so popular in the programming languages community? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
vector_spaces
3 years ago
discuss
283.
Computational linguist Bob Carpenter says LLMs are intelligent. Here’s why (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
MacsHeadroom
3 years ago
discuss
284.
Risk without reward: The myth of wage compensation for hazardous work (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
the88doctor
3 years ago
discuss
285.
What happened with this trial of “How to talk so kids will listen” (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
3 years ago
discuss
286.
Malcolm Gladwell in a Nutshell (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
luu
4 years ago
discuss
287.
Why don’t we talk to each other the way we talk to Google? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
RicoElectrico
4 years ago
discuss
288.
Something can be clear, and it still takes years or even decades to resolve (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
289.
Speculating about assigning probabilities to speculative theories (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
jeffreyrogers
4 years ago
discuss
290.
Statistical methods that only work if you don’t use them (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
291.
From 0 to 100K in 10 years: nurturing open-source community [pdf] (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
292.
Not Frequentist Enough (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
293.
Rich guys and their dumb graphs (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
294.
How feminism has made me a better scientist (2018) (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
295.
WSJ’s reputation publishing a column by s/o associated with fraudulent research? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
Tomte
4 years ago
discuss
296.
A comparative analysis of errors in learning from data in psychology and ML (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
DyslexicAtheist
4 years ago
discuss
297.
“Stylized Facts in the Social Sciences” (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
curiousgal
4 years ago
discuss
298.
Google’s Problems with Reproducibility (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
qsi
4 years ago
discuss
299.
Selecting on statistical significance and practical importance is wrong [pdf] (stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
conformist
4 years ago
discuss
300.
How do things work at top econ journals, exactly? (statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu)
3 points
amadeuspagel
4 years ago
discuss
More