I’ve been working on an architectural specification to address the structural flaws of email (noise/spam) and centralized platforms (lack of sovereignty). I just released the initial RFC/Manifesto on GitHub and I’m looking for feedback.

The core concept is ARK: a sovereign knowledge node infrastructure.

Unlike email (open protocol = spam) or social platforms (centralized = algorithmic bias), ARK relies on "Federation by Consent":

1. Sovereignty by Design: You run your own ARK (node). You own the data, the users, and the rules. 2. Anti-Spam Structure: There is no public inbox. Nodes can only communicate after a handshake/peering agreement. If a node becomes toxic, you disconnect unilaterally. 3. GENESIS Module (Sovereign RAG): An internal engine that turns answered questions into reusable knowledge assets using local RAG, preventing knowledge drain. 4. Moral Compass: A lightweight, local LLM layer for civic guidance and moderation, controlled by the node owner, not a central censor.

This is currently a protocol specification (v1.0), not a finished product. I am proposing this shift from centralized platforms to sovereign federations and looking for architects/devs interested in building the reference implementation.

The repository (Manifesto):https://github.com/carropereziago-blip/ARK-G-NESIS/blob/main/README.md Feedback on the architecture and federation logic is very welcome.