While this seems like a natural evolution of interview preparation, it also raises an important question: Are we still evaluating a candidate’s true skills, or just their ability to leverage AI-generated insights? If someone relies on AI to craft perfect answers, are we really seeing their authentic problem-solving and communication skills, or just a well-polished script?

This brings up a larger discussion about the future of hiring and automation. If AI is helping candidates present themselves better, is it an inevitable progression in how people prepare for jobs, or does it create a bias where companies aren’t truly assessing the person behind the responses? Will hiring managers need to change how they evaluate candidates to account for AI-assisted answers, or will AI simply become another tool like resumes and cover letters—something expected rather than questioned?

I’m curious to hear what others think. Should we embrace AI as a normal part of interview preparation, or is there a risk that it could distort the hiring process? Could this trend eventually lead to a completely different hiring model where AI plays a central role in both interviews and assessments? Would love to get the thoughts of the community on where this is headed.