Even though I don't get the the most accurate answers from ChatGPT it provides very good direction. Like try googling for "python asyncio futures integrating with callback-based libraries"; I got only the Python API Doc result that was really relevant/good. Now look at ChatGPT: https://chat.openai.com/share/e8ad1d40-56f0-494e-96b9-63ae95e155bb the query is:

"

> Use a Future when you're dealing with lower-level code, especially when integrating with callback-based libraries or systems.

Can you explain with an example from the Task class's source code or with an example? "

Several useful blog posts(the first link is broken in teh ChatGPT link but try googling for just the Path in the URL and you get to https://lwn.net/Articles/692254/ page, which is great!).

Bard just falls flat: https://g.co/bard/share/0deaad2e3817

Another example is where I ask for tutorials/videos explaining AsyncIO and there were several quality results like: https://snarky.ca/how-the-heck-does-async-await-work-in-python-3-5/ and of course David Beazley. Google just spams you with ONLY video results. If you remove the term "video" the results are better. But since the latter is a more basic query I expect google to be able to do reasonably. Bard for what ever reason refuses(https://g.co/bard/share/79c0bc347c99).

Also Google has plenty of very distracting SEO content interspersed with useful results.

Bing says download Edge to use the Chat Bot. Yeah right...

I am paying 20$ per month for ChatGPT Premium. But it does not seem Google/Bing are options I would ever pay for not because I expect them to be free but because they are not nearly as dev friendly as ChatGPT.

I have tons of more examples like this.