The page contains several positive sentences about antidepressants. 3 random examples:

- Reviews of antidepressants generally find that they benefit adults with depression.

- For children and adolescents, fluvoxamine is effective in treating a range of anxiety disorders. Fluoxetine, sertraline, and paroxetine can also help with managing various forms of anxiety in children and adolescents.

- Unlike social anxiety and PTSD, some TCAs antidepressants, like clomipramine and imipramine, have shown efficacy for panic disorder.

But most of the page feels doubtful, or even against the use of these drugs.

For example, the introduction is really scary in itself. You can read that:

- There is an increased risk of suicidal thinking and behavior when taken by children, adolescents, and young adults.

- Other researchers also conclude that anti-depressants ultimately do more harm than good, indicating that they cause permanent neuronal damage, apoptosis and disrupt numerous adaptive processes regulated by serotonin.

- The placebo effect may account for most or all of the drugs' observed efficacy

And all these points are really poorly counterbalanced.

I think one could argue the page tends to discourage the take of antidepressants.

But still, doctors all over the world are prescribing them.

Is Wikipedia accurate here?

If so, why are doctors prescribing them? I heard a lot of takes gravitating around: "pharmaceutical industry makes a lot of money with them, so they push the use of these drugs", but it seems to conspiracy-theory-ish to be true.

Is Wikipedia inaccurate here?

If so, why? Can we trust Wikipedia objectivity?