To me, as a kernel-newbie, it is an interesting patch, as it enables profiling the scheduler with small overhead, changing the scheduler decision, and has barely observable overhead (NOP instruction) when no BPF programs are loaded.

Does anyone know why the discussion is so quiet?

Thanks!

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/ [2] https://lwn.net/Articles/873244/