Mentioning testimony from the 8hr FDA conference call on Sep 17 questions why we don't actually have data proving the vaccine is safe for those under 65? (see https://youtu.be/WFph7-6t34M?t=15576). Providing this info labels you an anti-vaxxer and banished even when it comes directly from the FDA advisors.

Why does the US require people that are already immune to get a vaccine even though studies prove you are as good or better protected than those that got the vaccine? See British Medical Journal: https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n2101. Even though this is basic immunology knowledge this also gets you labelled as an anti-vaxxer.

Why do people always try to prove the covid vaccines are beneficial by saying your anti-body levels are higher after getting a covid vaccine or booster when this is NOT how you actually measure long term resistance? Anyone with basic human immunology knowledge knows that anti-bodies always drop over time. They are produced when they are needed to fight off an invader when they are detected. If anti-bodies never dropped from all the invaders we are exposed to all the time our blood would be as thick as molasses.

I fear for our future now that it is common to simply banish anyone who doesn't go along with the status quo.