https://off-guardian.org/2020/11/17/covid19-evidence-of-global-fraud/

And here is a fact check of fraud claims by USAToday found as FALSE:

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/10/08/fact-check-post-claiming-covid-19-fraud-offers-no-evidence/3481311001/

Regardless of the claims, what is the fact checking process?

Firstly, if you read through the 'Fact Check' you will see this is NOT rigorous. USAToday state the claim, and then provide a official response to counter it. But the official response is what is being brought into question! It's literally accepting the final word from the defendant.

Secondly, USAToday chooses a poor example of the 'fraud claims' info on Facebook to debunk. Because of that, it can say that there is no info as to how there is fraud on the tests, that the author didn't respond to requests, etc. So, the fact check article does not even need to address the fraud claims.

By purposely selecting poor material, USAToday do not need to look into any fraud details. The can say 'no fraud' without explaining why.

But even so, this so called 'Independent Fact Check' is then used by Facebook, and presumably others, in order to warn people off the content.

Frankly, the process is a shambles. Information is presented to Facebook that questions the official story. Facebook ask a media expert (USAToday) to fact-check it. USAToday ask the officials who are being accused in the information for the final word. The information is labelled as FALSE.

This is a closed loop, and has nothing to do with getting to the truth.

As Orwell said in 1984: "Whatever the Party holds to be truth is truth."