The recent ruling by the 9Th CAP states that a user is not legally (criminally(civil maybe?)) bound by the ToS of a website operator. Does that make a public endpoint that doesn't require authorization (or maybe even one that does) open for use as a user sees fit? That was my reading of the situation now, would you agree disagree?Article - https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/02/violating-terms-use-isnt-crime-eff-tells-court-again