ICANN will soon be voting on a change to the .jobs TLD. They took comments on it for a month (http://forum.icann.org/lists/jobs-phased-allocation/), and just released a summary of all the comments (http://forum.icann.org/lists/jobs-phased-allocation/pdfD2L3BBFXOj.pdf). The thing is that this "summary" so biased that it is hard to talk about it without sounding like I'm making it up. But I'll give an example...

In the summary, they give the following list as a sample of the companies that oppose the change: American Veterinary Medical Association, National Science Teachers Association, Pacific TransUnion LLC, Job Target, IAEWS members, Newspaper Association of America, CareerXroads, LatPro, Inc., and NAFSA: Association of International Educators.

Not in the list: Google. Which is interesting, because Randy Levinson of Google submitted a fantastic article regarding the need for the rejection (so http://bit.ly/d8Zx3b). Somebody at ICANN nuked the record of the letter though (http://forum.icann.org/lists/jobs-phased-allocation/threads.html) - thank god for Google Cache.

Any directions on who I should try to tell this story to?