Parody and extremism are interchangeable. [2][3]

As a result, content curators and creators gain short-term benefits from banning and removing critics, both real and perceived. [4]

Thus, to preserve the curated (and profitable) filter bubble, those who critique it must be banned because cultural consistency (also known as memetic rent-seeking) is more desirable than cultural innovation.

Therefore, it becomes profitable to purge future philosophers en masse from conventional avenues of social media, forcing them to seek refuge in the unprofitable ether of highly anonymous digital space.

1. https://qz.com/913114/bill-gates-says-filter-bubbles-are-a-serious-problem-with-news/

2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law

3. http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/List_of_Poe%27s_Law_examples#People (Stephan Colbert reference)

4. http://contentmarketinginstitute.com/2015/11/ditch-blog-comment-sections/